Peer Review reports
From: The accuracy of general practitioner workforce projections
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 12 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Buchan |
| 13 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Judy Bloom |
| 24 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gustavo Nigenda |
| 15 May 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Malou Van Greuningen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 15 May 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 21 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Judy Bloom |
| 19 Jun 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Malou Van Greuningen |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 19 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 2 Jul 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 16 Jul 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1478-4491-11-31 |
You can find further information about peer review here.