Human Resources for Health
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
ResearchConsiderations for increasing the competences and capacities of the public health workforce: assessing the training needs of public health workers in TexasStephen Borders1,2 , Craig Blakely3 , Barbara Quiram3 and Kenneth McLeroy3  1
Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA 2
Prior Affiliation: Texas A&M University System Health Science Center – School of Rural Public Health, College Station, Texas, USA 3
Texas A&M University System Health Science Center – School of Rural Public Health, College Station, Texas, USA author email corresponding author email
Human Resources for Health 2006,
4:18doi:10.1186/1478-4491-4-18 Abstract
Background
Over the last two decades, concern has been expressed about the readiness of the public health workforce to adequately address the scientific, technological, social, political and economic challenges facing the field. A 1988 report from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) served as a catalyst for the re-examination of the public health workforce. The IOM's call to increase the relevance of public health education and training prompted a renewed effort to identify competences needed by public health personnel and the organizations that employ them.
Methods
A recent evaluation sought to address the role of the 10 essential public health services in job services among the Texas public health workforce. Additionally, the evaluation examined the Texas public health workforce's need for training in the 10 essential public health services.
Results and conclusion
Overall, the level of perceived training needs varied dramatically by job category and health department type. When comparing aggregate training needs, public health workers with greater day-to-day contact (nurses, health educators) indicated a greater need for training than their peers who did not, such as those working in administrative positions. When prioritizing and designing future training modules regarding the 10 essential public health services, trainers should consider the effects of job function, location and contact with the public. |