Table 2

Effects of index predictors on job satisfaction for nurses, auxiliaries and doctors (Beta, significance of difference, B and 95% CI)


Beta
Pvalue
B
95% CI for B

Nurses N = 1066
(Constant)

= .00
1.86
(1.51–2.21)
Age
0.03
0.33
0.02
(-0.02–0.07)
Top management
0.18
<0.001
0.18
(0.10–0.26)
Local leadership
0.23
<0.001
0.19
(0.12–0.26)
Competence
0.00
0.90
0.00
(-0.04–0.04)
Work organization
0.19
<0.001
0.07
(0.04–0.11)
Professional development
0.06
0.11
0.06
(-0.01–0.12)
Adjusted R2 = 0.293




Auxiliaries N = 390
(Constant)

0.00
1.46
(0.84–2.08)
Age
0.05
0.39
0.03
(-0.04–0.11)
Top management
0.10
0.21
0.10
(-0.06–0.25)
Local leadership
0.20
0.01
0.18
(0.05–0.32)
Competence
0.14
0.03
0.08
(0.01–0.14)
Work organization
0.03
0.70
0.01
(-0.04–0.06)
Professional development
0.21
0.002
0.18
(0.07–0.30)
Adjusted R2 = 0.251




Doctors N = 358
(Constrant)

0.00
1.26
(0.61–1.91)
Age
-0.13
0.01
-0.10
(-0.18– -0.02)
Top management
0.05
0.47
0.05
(-0.08–0.17)
Local leadership
0.22
0.00
0.23
(0.10–0.36)
Competence
0.07
0.22
0.05
(-0.03–0.12)
Work organization
0.12
0.09
0.05
(-0.01–0.11)
Professional development
0.37
<0.001
0.34
(0.23–0.45)
Adjusted R2 = 0.398





Krogstad et al. Human Resources for Health 2006 4:3   doi:10.1186/1478-4491-4-3

Open Data