Table 1 |
||||||
|
Sub-national influence in human resource management in East Asia |
||||||
| Domain |
Cambodia |
China |
Indonesia |
Philippines |
Thailand |
Vietnam |
|
|
||||||
| Budget control |
||||||
| • Determine the wage envelope |
* |
* |
* |
** |
* |
* |
| • Dismiss surplus staff |
** |
** |
*** |
* |
||
| Establishment control |
||||||
| • Control overall staffing numbers |
* |
** |
* |
** |
* |
* |
| • Control staffing numbers in individual facilities |
** |
** |
*** |
** |
||
| Recruitment |
||||||
| • Formal employer |
*** |
*** |
* |
*** |
** |
* |
| • Have authority to hire |
** |
*** |
** |
*** |
* |
*** |
| • Have independent recruitment mechanism |
* |
** |
** |
* |
* |
* |
| Career management |
||||||
| • Promotion is available |
* |
** |
** |
*** |
* |
* |
| • Transfers within local government are possible |
* |
* |
*** |
*** |
* |
** |
| Performance management |
||||||
| • Direct and supervise activities |
*** |
*** |
** |
*** |
*** |
*** |
| • Conduct evaluations |
* |
*** |
** |
*** |
* |
* |
| • Offer financial rewards |
* |
* |
** |
** |
* |
** |
| • Discipline and fire underperforming staff |
* |
* |
** |
** |
* |
** |
| Pay policy |
||||||
| • Set overall wage rates |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
| • Set local incentives/salary top-ups |
** |
*** |
** |
*** |
* |
** |
|
|
||||||
|
*** = full; ** = partial; * = no subnational control, focusing on the strongest subnational level of government for each country. Data underlying the assessment range from 2000 – 2005. Source: adapted from table 7.3 in [26] supplemented by author's estimates for Vietnam. |
||||||
|
Fritzen Human Resources for Health 2007 5:4 doi:10.1186/1478-4491-5-4 |
||||||