<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>Human Resources for Health - Latest articles</title>
		<link>http://www.human-resources-health.com</link>
		<description>The latest articles from Human Resources for Health (ISSN 1478-4491) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/12"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/11"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/10"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/9"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/8"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/7"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/6"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/5"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/4"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/3"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>  
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/12">
            
            <title>Assessing the impact of a new health sector pay system upon NHS staff in the United Kingdom</title>
			<description>Background:
Pay and pay systems are a critical element in any health sector human resource strategy. Changing a pay system can be one strategy to achieve or sustain organizational change. This paper reports on the design and implementation of a completely new pay system in the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom. 'Agenda for Change' constitutes the largest-ever attempt to introduce a new pay system in the UK public services, covering more than one million staff. Its objectives were to improve the delivery of patient care as well as enhance staff recruitment, retention and motivation, and to facilitate new ways of working.
Methods:
This study was the first independent assessment of the impact of Agenda for Change at a local and national level. The methods used in the research were a literature review; review of 'grey' unpublished documentation provided by key stakeholders in the process; analysis of available data; interviews with key national informants (representing government, employers and trade unions), and case studies conducted with senior human resource managers in ten NHS hospitals  in England
Results:
Most of the NHS trust managers interviewed were in favour of Agenda for Change, believing it would assist in delivering improvements in patient care and staff experience. The main benefits highlighted were: 'fairness', moving different staff groups on to harmonized conditions; equal pay claim 'protection'; and scope to introduce new roles and working practices. 
Conclusions:
Agenda for Change took several years to design, and has only recently been implemented. Its very scale and central importance to NHS costs and delivery of care argues for a full assessment at an early stage so that lessons can be learned and any necessary changes made. This paper highlights weaknesses in evaluation and limitations in progress. The absence of systematically derived and applied impact indicators makes it difficult to assess impact and impact variations. Similarly, the lack of any full and systematic evaluation constrains the overall potential for Agenda for Change to deliver improvements to the NHS.  </description>
			<link>http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/12</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>James Buchan and David Evans</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Human Resources for Health 2008, 6:12</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-4491-6-12</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Human Resources for Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1478-4491</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-30</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/11">
            
            <title>Improving retention and performance in civil society in Uganda</title>
			<description>This article is the second article in the Human Resources for Health journal's first quarterly feature. The series of seven articles has been contributed by Management Sciences for Health (MSH) under the theme of leadership and management in public health and will be published article-by-article over the next few weeks. The journal invited Dr Manuel M. Dayrit, Director of the WHO Department of Human Resources for Health and former Minister of Health for the Philippines to launch the feature with an opening editorial to be found in the journal's blog.This article &#8211; number two in the series &#8211; describes the experience of the Family Life Education Programme (FLEP), a reproductive health program that provides community-based health services through 40 clinics in five districts of Uganda, in improving retention and performance by using the Management Sciences for Health (MSH) Human Resource Management Rapid Assessment Tool.A few years ago, the FLEP of Busoga Diocese began to see an increase in staff turnover and a decrease in overall organizational performance. The workplace climate was poor and people stopped coming for services even though there were few other choices in the area. An external assessment found the quality of the health care services provided was deficient.An action plan to improve their human resource management (HRM) system was developed and implemented. To assess the strengths and weaknesses of their system and to develop an action plan, they used the Rapid Assessment Tool. The tool guides users through a process of prioritizing and action planning after the assessment is done.By implementing the various recommended changes, FLEP established an improved, responsive HRM system. Increased employee satisfaction led to less staff turnover, better performance, and increased utilization of health services. These benefits were achieved by cost-effective measures focused on professionalizing the organization's approach to HRM.</description>
			<link>http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/11</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Mary L O'Neil and Michael Paydos</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Human Resources for Health 2008, 6:11</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-06-20</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-4491-6-11</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Human Resources for Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1478-4491</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-20</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/10">
            
            <title>Human resource leadership: the key to improved results in health</title>
			<description>This article is the lead article in the Human Resources for Health journal's first quarterly feature. The series of seven articles has been contributed by Management Sciences for Health (MSH) under the theme of leadership and management in public health and will be published article by article over the next few weeks. The journal has invited Dr Manuel M. Dayrit, Director of the WHO Department of Human Resources for Health and former Minister of Health for the Philippines to launch the feature with an opening editorial to be found in the journal's blog.This opening article describes the human resource challenges that managers around the world report and analyses why solutions often fail to be implemented.Despite rising attention to the acute shortage of health care workers, solutions to the human resource (HR) crisis are difficult to achieve, especially in the poorest countries. Although we are aware of the issues and have developed HR strategies, the problem is that some old systems of leading and managing human resources for health do not work in today's context.The Leadership Development Program (LDP) is grounded on the belief that good leadership and management can be learned and practiced at all levels. The case studies in this issue were chosen to illustrate results from using the LDP at different levels of the health sector.The LDP makes a profound difference in health managers' attitudes towards their work. Rather than feeling defeated by a workplace climate that lacks motivation, hope, and commitment to change, people report that they are mobilized to take action to change the status quo. The lesson is that without this capacity at all levels, global policy and national HR strategies will fail to make a difference.</description>
			<link>http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/10</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Mary L O'Neil</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Human Resources for Health 2008, 6:10</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-06-20</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-4491-6-10</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Human Resources for Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1478-4491</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-20</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/9">
            
            <title>Workforce participation among international medical graduates in the National Health Service of England: a retrospective longitudinal study</title>
			<description>Background:
Balancing medical workforce supply with demand requires good information about factors affecting retention. Overseas qualified doctors comprise 30% of the National Health Service (NHS) workforce in England yet little is known about the impact of country of qualification on length of stay. We aimed to address this need.
Methods:
Using NHS annual census data, we calculated the duration of 'episodes of work' for doctors entering the workforce between 1992 and 2003. Survival analysis was used to examine variations in retention by country of qualification. The extent to which differences in retention could be explained by differences in doctors' age, sex and medical specialty was examined by logistic regression.
Results:
Countries supplying doctors to the NHS could be divided into those with better or worse long-term retention than domestically trained doctors. Countries in the former category were generally located in the Middle East, non-European Economic Area Europe, Northern Africa and Asia, and tended to be poorer with fewer doctors per head of population, but stronger economic growth. A doctor's age and medical specialty, but not sex, influenced patterns of retention.
Conclusion:
Adjusting workforce participation by country of qualification can improve estimates of the number of medical school places needed to balance supply with demand. Developing countries undergoing strong economic growth are likely to be the most important suppliers of long stay medical migrants.</description>
			<link>http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/9</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Mark Hann, Bonnie Sibbald and Ruth Young</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Human Resources for Health 2008, 6:9</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-30</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-4491-6-9</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Human Resources for Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1478-4491</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-30</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/8">
            
            <title>Human resources for health challenges of public health system reform in Georgia</title>
			<description>Background:
Human resources (HR) are one of the most important components determining performance of public health system. The aim of this study was to assess adequacy of HR of local public health agencies to meet the needs emerging from health care reforms in Georgia.
Methods:
We used the Human Resources for Health Action Framework, which includes six components: HR management, policy, finance, education, partnerships and leadership. The study employed: (a) quantitative methods: from September to November 2004, 30 randomly selected district Centers of Public Health (CPH) were surveyed through face-to-face interviews with the CPH director and one public health worker randomly selected from all professional staff; and (b) qualitative methods: in November 2004, Focus Group Discussions (FGD) were held among 3 groups: a) 12 district public health professionals, b) 11 directors of district public health centers, and c) 10 policy makers at central level.
Results:
There was an unequal distribution of public health workers across selected institutions, with lack of professionals in remote rural district centers and overstaffing in urban centers. Survey respondents disagreed or were uncertain that public health workers possess adequate skills and knowledge necessary for delivery of public health programs. FGDs shed additional light on the survey findings that there is no clear vision and plans on HR development. Limited budget, poor planning, and ignorance from the local government were mentioned as main reasons for inadequate staffing. FGD participants were concerned with lack of good training institutions and training programs, lack of adequate legislation for HR issues, and lack of necessary resources for HR development from the government.
Conclusion:
After ten years of public health system reforms in Georgia, the public health workforce still has major problems such as irrational distribution and inadequate knowledge and skills. There is an urgent need for re-training and training programs and development of conducive policy environment with sufficient resources to address these problems and assure adequate functionality of public health programs.</description>
			<link>http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/8</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Mamuka Djibuti, George Gotsadze, George Mataradze and George Menabde</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Human Resources for Health 2008, 6:8</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-27</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-4491-6-8</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Human Resources for Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1478-4491</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/7">
            
            <title>Review of the utilization of HEEPF &#8211; competitive projects for educational enhancement in the Egyptian medical sector</title>
			<description>In Egypt, the medical sector has been facing the same problems that challenged the system of higher education in the past decades, mainly an increasing student enrollment, limited resources, and old governance and bylaws. These constraints and the escalating paucity of resources have had a major negative influence on quality of education. Consequently, thoughts of educational reform came forward in the form of competitive projects, which have attracted several institutes from the health sector to improve their educational performance. The aim of this paper is to review the share of the medical sector in the higher education enhancement project fund (HEEPF), its outcomes, sustainability, and to provide recommendations for keeping the momentum of reform pursuit in the future. The methodology included obtaining statistics pertaining to the medical sector in Egypt as regards colleges, students, and staff. We also reviewed the self-studies of the medical sector colleges, HEEPF projects reports, performance appraisal reports, and World Bank reports on HEEPF achievements in order to retrieve the required data. Results showed that medical sector had a large share of the HEEPF (28.5% of projects) as compared to its size (8% of student population). The projects covered 10 areas; the frequency distribution of which ranged between 4.4% (creation of new programs) to 97.8% (human resource development). In conclusion, educational enhancement in the medical sector in Egypt could be apparently achieved through the HEEPF competitive projects. A study of the long-term impact of these projects on the quality of education is recommended</description>
			<link>http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/7</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Galal Abdel-Hamid Abdellah, Salah El-Din Mohamed Fahmy Taher and Somaya Hosny</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Human Resources for Health 2008, 6:7</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-04-18</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-4491-6-7</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Human Resources for Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1478-4491</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-18</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/6">
            
            <title>Empowering the people: Development of an HIV peer education model for low literacy rural communities in India</title>
			<description>Background:
Despite ample evidence that HIV has entered the general population, most HIV awareness programs in India continue to neglect rural areas. Low HIV awareness and high stigma, fueled by low literacy, seasonal migration, gender inequity, spatial dispersion, and cultural taboos pose extra challenges to implement much-needed HIV education programs in rural areas. This paper describes a peer education model developed to educate and empower low-literacy communities in the rural district of Perambalur (Tamil Nadu, India).
Methods:
From January to December 2005, six non-governmental organizations (NGO's) with good community rapport collaborated to build and pilot-test an HIV peer education model for rural communities. The program used participatory methods to train 20 NGO field staff (Outreach Workers), 102 women's self-help group (SHG) leaders, and 52 barbers to become peer educators. Cartoon-based educational materials were developed for low-literacy populations to convey simple, comprehensive messages on HIV transmission, prevention, support and care. In addition, street theatre cultural programs highlighted issues related to HIV and stigma in the community.
Results:
The program is estimated to have reached over 30 000 villagers in the district through 2051 interactive HIV awareness programs and one-on-one communication. Outreach workers (OWs) and peer educators distributed approximately 62 000 educational materials and 69 000 condoms, and also referred approximately 2844 people for services including voluntary counselling and testing (VCT), care and support for HIV, and diagnosis and treatment of sexually-transmitted infections (STI). At least 118 individuals were newly diagnosed as persons living with HIV (PLHIV); 129 PLHIV were referred to the Government Hospital for Thoracic Medicine (in Tambaram) for extra medical support. Focus group discussions indicate that the program was well received in the communities, led to improved health awareness, and also provided the peer educators with increased social status.
Conclusion:
Using established networks (such as community-based organizations already working on empowerment of women) and training women's SHG leaders and barbers as peer educators is an effective and culturally appropriate way to disseminate comprehensive information on HIV/AIDS to low-literacy communities. Similar models for reaching and empowering vulnerable populations should be expanded to other rural areas.</description>
			<link>http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/6</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Koen KA Van Rompay, Purnima Madhivanan, Mirriam Rafiq, Karl Krupp, Venkatesan Chakrapani and Durai Selvam</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Human Resources for Health 2008, 6:6</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-04-18</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-4491-6-6</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Human Resources for Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1478-4491</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-18</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/5">
            
            <title>Intent to migrate among nursing students in Uganda: Measures of the brain drain in the next generation of health professionals</title>
			<description>Background:
There is significant concern about the worldwide migration of nursing professionals from low-income countries to rich ones, as nurses are lured to fill the large number of vacancies in upper-income countries. This study explores the views of nursing students in Uganda to assess their views on practice options and their intentions to migrate.
Methods:
Anonymous questionnaires were distributed to nursing students at the Makerere Nursing School and Aga Khan University Nursing School in Kampala, Uganda, during July 2006, using convenience sampling methods, with 139 participants. Two focus groups were also conducted at one university.
Results:
Most (70%) of the participants would like to work outside Uganda, and said it was likely that within five years they would be working in the U.S. (59%) or the U.K. (49%). About a fourth (27%) said they could be working in another African country. Only eight percent of all students reported an unlikelihood to migrate within five years of training completion. Survey respondents were more dissatisfied with financial remuneration than with any other factor pushing them towards emigration. Those wanting to work in the settings of urban, private, or U.K./U.S. practices were less likely to express a sense of professional obligation and/or loyalty to country. Those who have lived in rural areas were less likely to report wanting to emigrate. Students with a desire to work in urban areas or private practice were more likely to report an intent to emigrate for financial reasons or in pursuit of country stability, while students wanting to work in rural areas or public practice were less likely to want to emigrate overall.
Conclusion:
Improving remuneration for nurses is the top priority policy change sought by nursing students in our study. Nursing schools may want to recruit students desiring work in rural areas or public practice to lead to a more stable workforce in Uganda.</description>
			<link>http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/5</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Lisa Nguyen, Steven Ropers, Esther Nderitu, Anneke Zuyderduin, Sam Luboga and Amy Hagopian</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Human Resources for Health 2008, 6:5</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-02-12</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-4491-6-5</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Human Resources for Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1478-4491</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/4">
            
            <title>Managerial competencies of hospital managers in South Africa: a survey of managers in the public and private sectors</title>
			<description>Background:
South Africa has large public and private sectors and there is a common perception that public sector hospitals are inefficient and ineffective while the privately owned and managed hospitals provide superior care and are more sustainable. The underlying assumption is that there is a potential gap in management capacity between the two sectors. This study aims to ascertain the skills and competency levels of hospital managers in South Africa and to determine whether there are any significant differences in competency levels between managers in the different sectors.
Methods:
A survey using a self administered questionnaire was conducted among hospital managers in South Africa. Respondents were asked to rate their proficiency with seven key functions that they perform. These included delivery of health care, planning, organizing, leading, controlling, legal and ethical, and self-management. Ratings were based on a five point Likert scale ranging from very low skill level to very high skill level.
Results:
The results show that managers in the private sector perceived themselves to be significantly more competent than their public sector colleagues in most of the management facets. Public sector managers were also more likely than their private sector colleagues to report that they required further development and training.
Conclusion:
The findings confirm our supposition that there is a lack of management capacity within the public sector in South Africa and that there is a significant gap between private and public sectors. It provides evidence that there is a great need for further development of managers, especially those in the public sector. The onus is therefore on administrators and those responsible for management education and training to identify managers in need of development and to make available training that is contextually relevant in terms of design and delivery.</description>
			<link>http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/4</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Rubin Pillay</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Human Resources for Health 2008, 6:4</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-02-08</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-4491-6-4</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Human Resources for Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1478-4491</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-08</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/3">
            
            <title>What if we decided to take care of everyone who needed treatment? Workforce planning in Mozambique using simulation of demand for HIV/AIDS care</title>
			<description>Background:
The growing AIDS epidemic in southern Africa is placing an increased strain on health systems, which are experiencing steadily rising patient loads. Health care systems are tackling the barriers to serving large populations in scaled-up operations. One of the most significant challenges in this effort is securing the health care workforce to deliver care in settings where the manpower is already in short supply.
Methods:
We have produced a demand-driven staffing model using simple spreadsheet technology, based on treatment protocols for HIV-positive patients that adhere to Mozambican guidelines. The model can be adjusted for the volumes of patients at differing stages of their disease, varying provider productivity, proportion who are pregnant, attrition rates, and other variables.
Results:
Our model projects the need for health workers using three different kinds of goals:1) the number of patients to be placed on anti-retroviral therapy (ART),2) the number of HIV-positive patients to be enrolled for treatment, and3) the number of patients to be enrolled in a treatment facility per month.
Conclusion:
We propose three scenarios, depending on numbers of patients enrolled. In the first scenario, we start with 8000 patients on ART and increase that number to 58 000 at the end of three years (those were the goals for the country of Mozambique). This would require thirteen clinicians and just over ten nurses by the end of the first year, and 67 clinicians and 47 nurses at the end of the third year. In a second scenario, we start with 34 000 patients enrolled for care (not all of them on ART), and increase to 94 000 by the end of the third year, requiring a growth in clinician staff from 18 to 28. In a third scenario, we start a new clinic and enrol 200 new patients per month for three years, requiring 1.2 clinicians in year 1 and 2.2 by the end of year 3. Other clinician types in the model include nurses, social workers, pharmacists, phlebotomists, and peer counsellors. This planning tool could lead to more realistic and appropriate estimates of workforce levels required to provide high-quality HIV care in a low-resource settings.</description>
			<link>http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/6/1/3</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Amy Hagopian, Mark A Micek, Ferruccio Vio, Kenneth Gimbel-Sherr and Pablo Montoya</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Human Resources for Health 2008, 6:3</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-02-07</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1478-4491-6-3</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Human Resources for Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1478-4491</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-07</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
    <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
