Peer Review reports
From: Effective in-service training design and delivery: evidence from an integrative literature review
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 11 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Carroll |
| 17 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lesley-Anne Long |
| 29 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hugh Barr |
| 3 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hugo Mercer |
| 20 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Julia Bluestone |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 20 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 29 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hugh Barr |
| 2 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Carroll |
| 25 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lesley-Anne Long |
| 28 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hugo Mercer |
| 26 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gilles Dussault |
| 16 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Julia Bluestone |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 16 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 20 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Julia Bluestone |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 20 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 21 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hugo Mercer |
| 26 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gilles Dussault |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 2 May 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 1 Oct 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1478-4491-11-51 |
You can find further information about peer review here.