Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
2 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Willemijn de Graaf-Ruizendaal |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
12 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Terhi Kankaanranta |
30 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniela Koller |
2 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Marschall |
2 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Krit Pongpirul |
6 Jun 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Willemijn de Graaf-Ruizendaal |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
6 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
14 Jun 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Terhi Kankaanranta |
15 Jun 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Krit Pongpirul |
18 Jun 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Marschall |
4 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniela Koller |
20 Aug 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Willemijn de Graaf-Ruizendaal |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
20 Aug 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
14 Sep 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Marschall |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Publishing | ||
7 Oct 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
27 Oct 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1478-4491-11-55 |
You can find further information about peer review here.